This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
My working theory for guys like David Grusch, John Podesta, Bob Lazar, and pretty much every other "senior official" coming forward claiming that the US government has access to alien technology is that that are at least vaguely on the spectrum and don't realize when they're being messed with, or otherwise being nudged to mind their own business.
If I'm a defense contractor assigned to a black project, and some chick at the bar or one of my coworkers who hasn't been read-in asks me "where I've been for the last 3 days" or "what I'm working on" I can not tell them the truth. If I did, the DCSA agent handling my case would be waiting for me at my front door when I got home and I would at least be out of a job if not standing before a judge. However, if I tell them I've been dissecting aliens out at Site-4 I am obviously joking and no harm no foul.
Edit: That is unless someone actually believes me
Yeah, especially because almost all these stories are second hand, like the Grusch stuff is that he encountered people who told him the aliens were real. Obviously if someone said this they were messing with him, but he’s too autistic or otherwise gullible to see that, so he believes it.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link