site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 10, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

13
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

… My personal instinct is that it may be that the Harvard brand is about baffling people with bullshit over actually producing quality scholarship…

I would insist that the broad appeal Harvard has is mostly a ‘branding’ issue from the get-go. As a brand, it has far more resources to mobilize for research purposes and educational value it ‘could’ add, if it wanted to. But I have a hard time believing a person who’s there solely for learning the technical skills of his career of interest, is going to experience a substantially greater education than if he went to a university with little to no brand at all.

In a way it’s hardly any different from the restaurant industry. If you’re hungry and don’t want to starve, McDonalds or Eleven Madison Park will do. The former will accomplish just as much as the latter will. But people pay a premium for the latter, because you get to rub shoulders with the elites of society. Nepotism has an enormous appeal if you can manage your way into a place like Harvard.

When I did work in Stanford University, if you walked into the FedEx office that they had on campus, or the print centers, on certain days, students would ‘fill’ the place to the brim, with USB sticks to get these large poster prints made, that were diagrams of original research they had to do, for homework assignments. And that’s been one ‘major’ complaint of the whole American university system. That these places are research factories where students get exploited out of their insights and value for the benefit of the institution. They are not primarily teaching facilities.