This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
At least in America PhD is merely a scam for foreigners who want a visa or Americans who don't understand time value of money. I was thinking more of a professional degree - executive MBA in the health field, a partially-remote data science or bioinformatics MA/MS. That leads to banking/consulting in the medical sector.
McKinsey consultants have nothing to fear from AI, because their job isn't to provide solutions. If you wanted to fix your problems, you could simply ask your employees how to improve. Managers hire a McKinsey consultant to give you social cover to refine and then do what they wanted to do in the first place. They are a priestly caste, not a service provider.
Non-MBB consultants might take a hit from AI, but even that's a good job as a springboard. You use your MBBS to get into the UK, you use your time in the UK to find some 1 year, possibly half-remote MBA/Masters, use that to get into banking/consulting, use that to get a transfer to the US office, use that to find out where you want to go in the future, which could be something different. It's the crazy American in me talking here - always be evolving, always be seeking, and swing from your vine to whatever better vine is swinging by.
If AI is your thing, there's probably someone hiring in medical AI.
Then tell her the real truth about AWFLs and social climbing. Watch her normie feed, and point out every time someone says something disparaging about America. See if there's a hidden class climbing motive to it. There almost always is. 99% of the time it's some AWFL trying to show how they're more caring/educated than their prole background, or complaining that their life is so hard because they're underappreciated by the proles. I've managed to pop plenty of rational but agreeable women out of the basic white chick liberalism memeplex simply by pointing out the status posturing underlying so much of it.
This isn't to say that America doesn't have problems. Be honest with her, America has problems, some of America's problems can be solved, and some of America's problems can be solved by (honest) liberals. But AWFL liberalism isn't about solving America's problems, America's problems, or even America. It's about the social status of AWFLs.
More options
Context Copy link