site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of July 3, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

There’s a dissident right talking point that China essentially brute-forced development by having a highly above-average IQ population. This is quite self-serving, I think @DaseindustriesLtd has commented on it before, but it goes something like this:

The CCP / Chinese system is hugely inefficient, corrupt and dysfunctional. Incentives are extremely fucked up; the blend of state owned industry and banks and limited private entrepreneurship under the auspices of the local and national party is deeply flawed, but if you have a population where the average intelligence is 5 points higher than it is in the West, you can essentially bulldoze obstacles because the baseline competence of the average worker is substantially higher than it is in almost every other developing country, and higher even than the average Westerner, allowing these cracks to be papered over. If China had 97 average IQ instead of 105, it would be about as rich as, say, Ukraine or Moldova. But when the median Chinese low-level bureaucrat is a standard deviation smarter than his median Iraqi or Brazilian or Sri Lankan peer the whole system is able to function at a more productive level.

It is a little questionable for Indian rightists to believe with minimal evidence that they are great cognitive elites unfairly shackled to 900 million dumdums. They might still be right, of course.


One other thought I’ve had, based solely on personal experiences:

Stagnant developing countries often have elites who are, broadly speaking, satisfied with their lot. Brazilians and Mexicans, Indians, Russians, even South Africans. The 99th percentile are usually relatively happy and comfortable and, in my limited experience, don’t really want much more than they have. Often inequality is so high in these places that the 99th percentile live as well as the 99th percentile in most of the West (if not better due to cheaper labor). They have that European tendency to be quite satisfied. By contrast, Vietnamese, Indonesians and Malaysians, Chinese and Central Asians, remind me more of Americans. They always want more than they have, no matter how much that is. Perhaps elite greed is underestimated. Indians may be personally ambitious (see their success in Silicon Valley), but in India proper, as long as life seems good, they’re often quite relaxed about things. I will always recall the wife of a Chinese centimillionaire crying and screaming in front of me because her daughter, my friend, was rejected from a moderately prestigious (charity!) internship (she got several others). My Indian friends all wanted to go to Harvard or Stanford, sure, but as long as they did something that could lead to a decently-paid job their parents didn’t freak out if they didn’t get in.