site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of September 12, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

40
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

That's my problem exactly with the argument that "oh hey, government = drug cartel, drug cartels bad, right?"

How about if I say the Juarez cartel is good because it's starting to serve the community? (Actually, how about if I say I don't know if I believe it, it sounds way too much like the Star Trek episode A Piece Of The Action?) They're taking the protection money and providing protection services in return. If this is how government gets started, count me in! Would it be better if they were taking the money and letting the place degenerate into a hellhole (or Philadelphia, which from the sound of it is the same thing?)

The libertarian argument here still depends on the notion that governments are supposed to be for the good of the governed, hence the comparison with cartels is meant to be a stunning knock-down: "Oh wow, the government abrogates to itself the use of force, just like a criminal enterprise? what a fool I was to believe all this democracy malarkey, from now on I'm Going Galt!"

However, no matter how crappy our governments get, they still are not quite on the level of drug cartels. And if the Juarez cartel is beginning to resemble a government, all the better for it: then it is doing some good to offset the real harm it is doing with the drug trade. Who knows, maybe some of them will put down the gun and decide to go for the ballot box instead, in time?