This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Not sure, but probably yes. They take the jobs on the premise that they will be tipped at roughly a certain rate.
Probably yes, but only if it is clearly and explicitly spelled out for people wondering about joining the frats (or whatever) what the hazing will consist of, or if at least it is explicitly spelled out that "we reserve the right to surprise you so be warned!".
No, that is just revenge.
Largely yes.
Yes, but it is also morally permissible to renege on the contract and run away afterwards.
Depends on whether you are working for a vulnerable mom and pop shop or some giant corporation.
No, we should maintain a tightly regulated healthcare sector but also have a separate unregulated sector so that people can choose between the two.
See above.
See above.
Yes except in cases where there is a clear trail of harm that can be objectively established.
No, but that does not mean they should be cast out into the street.
Yes, though it is a spectrum and more complicated than the stereotypical 19th century "caucasian/mongol/black" sort of distinctions.
Not sure.
I am not a utilitarian, so I lean in favor of thinking that it is.
Seems that way based on historical experience.
Not sure. One man's price gouging is another man's "what I have to do to keep my business afloat". Depends on the context.
Pornography is essentially prostitution but I support both being legal.
Yes.
Yes.
Depends on which laws.
This is a repeat question.
More options
Context Copy link