This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Refer to the other comment I just made, if such practises had large negative externalities then even my libertarian tendencies would be overwhelmed and I'd do my best to stop it from happening.
I currently contend that negative externalities (namely pissing off people and whatever weight the baby has) aren't significant enough for me to care in a vacuum, but if the human race was about to go extinct I'd certainly raise a fuss. (No, current sub replacement population growth in the West isn't at that level of concern, and likely never will be).
So, the life of a baby is contingent on many factors, but the primary value is what it's owners assign to it, such as a $100 bill is just a particularly aesthetic arrangement of dyes on fiber except for the fact it accrues value by other means, with the intrinsic value being of both being quite small. If you're burning your money, that's something that raises my eyebrow but I won't stop, similarly if you're committing infanticide of your child. I don't approve of other people doing either to things that don't belong to them.
As for population ethics, that's a concern primarily for standard utilitarians, I recognize that repugnant conclusions exist under their axioms, but I simply don't see much relevance under my own idiosyncratic worldview.
To a degree I consider it akin to the issues of designing a perfect voting system, if it turns out that all possible designs necessarily have tradeoffs on one front or another, then tough luck, either swallow the bitter pill or reformulate your needs. I'm largely agnostic to small changes as long as I'm not getting Dutch Booked in the process.
More options
Context Copy link