This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Was 1996 Alabama that racist? Yes, and no. It's hard for many people to get a handle on the mentality of rurals and the rural south. I'm actually from rural Ohio, but I have close relatives from the south, and it seems like people who live an hour from Columbus have more in common with people who live an hour from Columbia than they do with people who live in those cities a short distance away, so maybe I can offer some insight.
First, the N word is still thrown around carelessly in close company. In the 90s, moreso. It's derogatory but only nominally connected to race. There are true, hardcore racists as well, but they are mostly reactionary. They don't even categorically hate blacks even if they say they do. One of the most outspoken people i know would certainly be called a vile racist by most Americans on both sides of the aisle, but has an adopted black younger brother and has threatened the life of anyone who would call HIM a nigger. The closest parallel is probably to the kinds of nutters who call democrats "demon-rats" and claim they are all, to a man or woman, satanic child groomers, etc, despite having many close friends, co workers, and family members who are associated with that party. Of course, as there are lines in politics, so it goes in life. Badmouthing democrats but being friends is fine, but voting for one is certainly a step too far. Similarly, badmouthing and claiming to hate blacks while being their friend is fine, but a black boy who aimed to date their daughter would face one hell of an uphill battle to say the least.
Second, most people would probably immediately side against a black defendant in most instances. Shoplifting, theft, bne, barfights, whatever, the onus would be on the black guy to prove his innocence. I'm not sure this would be one of them- it really depends on how credible and known the evidence against the rapists was. Rurals will protect their own to an extent, but they know who the scumbags are. If those two were already known to be shitheels, they would 100% support the father's vigilante justice regardless of race. On the other hand, if the media circus caught wind and started making the whole thing about race or some other liberal value, the whole thing could flip in a second and they'd string him up out of spite. At that point all bets are off.
Fuck, that's how I'd deal with the situation too, and I'm a 4th generation city-slicker plus a civil-libertarian to boot.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link