This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I agree, White people already did a huge amount which IMO should have earned the lasting goodwill of Jews.
This is why I wrote so much about our failures to brag about what we have done, and to convert our past generosity into concrete commitments to friendship or at least non-enmity.
If we don't extensively brag about our aid, not only do we ourselves mostly remain ignorant (making it easier for others to browbeat us into moral submission), we also seem like enemies, since friends normally value their gifts to their other friends. "Look at how much I care about you, I made this just for you!" (Which is why Jews would ideally brag more about their contributions, too, to show that they care about us.)
I would also even suggest that more White identitarians should start bragging about Jewish achievements as our own. (This also solves the social faux pas of bragging about yourself- it always looks better when someone else brags about you. I bet vast numbers of Jews would be quite chuffed to see their achievements and generosity given more publicity, especially by White identitarians whom they currently fear.
And vice versa- imagine what would happen to the heads of White identitarians if Jews started doing a good job of reminding the world of the billions of lives White people have saved, and so on!)
If we behave like their success is not our success, then it creates a psychological schism. But if we treat their success as our mutual success, and expect them to treat all White success as their own as well, it creates a group identification which would be to our mutual benefit.
(This was the wisdom behind why so many clever operatives liked to talk about "Judeo-Christian civilization" and all that. It was an attempt to create a mutually-beneficial group identification, which many smart Goys and Jews of past generations recognized as valuable.)
Ideally, you would not want there to be any more of a sense of schism between the average Jew and the average White Goy, than between an ancestrally French person and an ancestral German, Brit, Pole, etc.
After all, all of these other White ethnicities have warred against each other plenty of times in history, and yet they can be friends today.
More options
Context Copy link