This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If that was how it would work out, it'd be great. But I'll tell you what will happen; back when I worked in local education, there was (still is) a programme for early school leavers (the idea is you get the kids who drop out of full-time education before legal school-leaving age and get them into a programme that will give them some basic life skills, some training, and steer them towards doing job courses rather than hanging around idle and getting into petty crime. They get paid a training allowance to make sure they attend).
The problem is, as soon as some budding Napoleon of Crime ended up in court, the first thing their lawyer did was plead with the judge that Junior Capone here was going to turn his life around and had a place on said course, so sending him to jail would ruin all his chances.
Very often the little tyke had no such place, because we didn't want him, because we knew he had damn-all interest in turning his life around. But judges love to show off that they're not the bad old judges of the past and even if they're middle/upper-middle class and well-off, they're down with the youth and the underprivileged, so this often worked.
So then we'd get lumbered with someone only interested in weed (they'd smoke right outside the front door of the building), porn (guess what they went looking for with access to computers during IT training classes), and easy money, who had no intention of doing anything but going back to their life of petty crime once the programme was finished. They had terrible attendance and no interest at all in learning anything, and indeed would spend class times winding up others to cause a melt-down so the staff were busy dealing with the results of that and Junior could skive off.
So I'm forecasting that even for adults, it will be a case of "yes, Your Honour, my client was sent on three different programmes which he failed to complete or even attend, but this time it will be different if you give him a chance on this new programme!"
More options
Context Copy link