This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don't think one's influence on societal decision making tracks particularly well with income. For instance, in Pittsburgh we have a rail trail that runs from downtown to Cumberland, Maryland, where it connects with the C&O Canal Towpath and continues to Washington, DC. The trail was constructed over a 20 year period thanks primarily to local trail chapters who did all of the fundraising and grant writing themselves and coordinated their efforts to complete a project that involved innumerable bridge and tunnel restorations and required significant right-of-way acquisition. In addition to being an exceptional local resource, the trail attracts people from around the country and the world who are looking to do a weeklong ride that doesn't involve significant hills or automotive traffic. It's only possible because of all the mostly anonymous civic-minded people who volunteer to cut the grass and chainsaw downed trees and find novel ways to keep tunnels from icing in the winter without having to close the trail. These are all volunteers and the only requirement for having this kind of power is to show up. Literally. Yeah, you may start at the bottom as a worker bee but if you're willing to do the work then people will start handing more and more responsibility to you.
I'm on the board of a similar nonprofit that involves recreation and we're currently in the midst of a huge project with a lot of moving parts and various state agencies and other nonprofits involved and if I had a problem that required intervention from on high I could get at least two and possibly three politicians up the ass of whatever bureaucrat was in my way, and if the problem went deeper than lack of priority we could probably get targeted legislation passed. I don't know if anyone on the board makes $250k but if they do it's purely incidental. Contrast this with friends of mine who are lawyers making more than $250k because they billed a bunch of hours on some lawsuit that no one has heard about or cares about. Who has more of an impact on society? Or one guy I know who owns a plumbing business that makes a ton of money but I don't think he even votes.
More options
Context Copy link