This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Of course I might not be the most objective on this given I've escaped cities precisely because I got tired of being robbed and assaulted (once even in my own apartment) while the police do nothing and would actually arrest me if I did something about it. And back then I had colleagues that got beaten up to invalidity for no reason, and others that saw crackheads every day on their way to work.
Since what we're discussing is the competence of the regime, I feel like those hellholes existing is relevant. They are no natural catastrophy. Some countries to this day, most countries in history, do not allow such things to exist.
I don't think it's unreasonable to see elites that have eschewed their basic duty to quash lawlessness as incompetent. And all the other aspects of society being treated with a similarly cavalier handwaving instead of practical problem solving I regard as yet more evidence of their incompetence. When's the last time somebody in power in the West actually solved a problem instead of papering over it with bullshit?
What you're describing here is the ruin your country has left in it. If you actually want to argue that the elites are competent you need to explain to me how they will actually fix problems. Not just point at things they haven't managed to fuck up yet
More options
Context Copy link