This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The teachers who go hard leftist tend to wind up as the comical self-defeating types. Since, in my experience, it's the social mixing that causes kids to swing further left, I'd expect the culling of DEI initiatives to be the ones that cause the liberalness of the college to reduce. The leftist ideals don't tend to sink in just because of the curriculum of universities or classes, but if you can cull the social mixing and affirmative action aspects, returning the demographics to what they were pre-1990, then the universities will eventually shift right.
Going after tenure is a mis-play by the rightist subfactions, and sending signal that even degrading the quality of the institution's research is fair game. If these policies get enacted, I don't expect anything except the further riling up of the sjw and democrat factions. One might wonder how long it will be until even moderate democrats start seeing the signs and picking up guns.
I expect that Vaushian-style stochastic leftist terrorism should start seeing an increase if these policies get enacted. Will the middling neoliberals see this as a threat? Unsure, but many neoliberals are getting increasingly uncomfortable with the moves the rightist members of TX and FL legislatures are making. I wonder whether they'll start to shift into leftism or what.
More options
Context Copy link