This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Well, the issue is there was no water main break but they did stop counting / sent people home so the question is why. Perhaps it was merely incompetence but it just looks suspicious. Once again, none of this is proof. And until you have proof the election result should stand.
My overarching point is that the deep state broke laws / convention to stop Trump. Then we know about election fortification and suspect stories. Is it really unbelievable that they (or other actors) wouldn’t “steal” an election? Once again, not proof! Just a point that when you add everything up it wouldn’t be shocking in the least if real evidence ultimately emerged.
Also, Giuliani didn’t publicize the story. I remember it was reported on election night. I remember hearing the report and thinking “shenanigans!”
Well it's helpful to specify suspicious of what, exactly? The theory (as best as I can understand it) is that someone made up a story of a water main break to get poll watchers to leave, in order to...pull out suitcases full of ballots in front of several security cameras? The water main break / overflowing urinal story makes a lot more sense as an instance of a game of telephone combined with the media's shoddy record with reporting breaking news.
Sorry I wasn't clear, Giuliani publicized the "suitcases of ballots" security camera footage.
More options
Context Copy link
In later reporting the issue was explained to be "a leaky toilet spilling water into a room with ballots early on Election Day", which did delay absentee ballot counting for a couple hours while the leak was fixed (on video, reportedly) late that night.
For this one the story is that "observers and media were not asked to leave. They simply left on their own when they saw one group of workers, whose job was only to open envelopes and who had completed that task, also leave" ... and ironically this more than a leaky urinal is what brings the phrase "don't piss on me and tell me it's raining" to mind. On the other hand, people misinterpreting "there's a water leak and we're going home" as "there's a water leak so we all have to go home" doesn't sound implausible. And in this case there don't seem to be recordings either way? Is "media" an inaccurate descriptor, just an aspirational long-term goal? Was there some rule against observers recording what they observe? Was all that stuff about how pocket-sized portable solid-state internet-connected A/V recorders were invented a decade ago and are now routinely carried by the vast majority of the population just a weird dream I had?
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link