site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 6, 2023

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

16
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

"okay, then change your name to a female name and start insisting that the world treat you like an actual woman".

Are we sure? That is an actual solution (though there are others of course). If you accept (as you appear to) that is should be ok for a man to fulfill all the social roles of a woman then a way to signal that is to dress, act and use the same words that are used for a woman. There is a built in set of words and roles that fit what he wants and that is much easier to utilize than creating a whole new categorization process and getting the world to accept it. It's easier to step into a role that already exists than create a new one. Even the word tomboy gestures in this way no? A girl who behaves like a boy would be expected to is called a tomboy. A man who acts like a woman perhaps used to be called a sissy (and still is in some circles) but if you want it to be socially accepted then is trans-woman really all that different? And is a trans man who doesn't actually get surgery or hormones and just socially transitions (the most common approach) really any different than a tomboy?

The directional goal of the saying trans-women are women (or trans men are men) and to treat them as such is to remove the social shame, which you agree should be removed. There are other avenues of doing so, but this one builds upon the existing rails so to speak.

This is one of the clash zones with Radical Feminism, which (generally) holds that those social gender roles/words/themes/ should be torn down in the first place. There are other trans people hold similar views (non-binary and the like) which is one of the fault lines withing the trans community itself.