Be advised: this thread is not for serious in-depth discussion of weighty topics (we have a link for that), this thread is not for anything Culture War related. This thread is for Fun. You got jokes? Share 'em. You got silly questions? Ask 'em.
- 122
- 1
What is this place?
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
If in doubt, please post it!
Rules
- Courtesy
- Content
- Engagement
- When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
- Proactively provide evidence in proportion to how partisan and inflammatory your claim might be.
- Accept temporary bans as a time-out, and don't attempt to rejoin the conversation until it's lifted.
- Don't attempt to build consensus or enforce ideological conformity.
- Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
- The Wildcard Rule
- The Metarule
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Any good recommendations for an intermediate economics textbook or lecture series or something that I can use to get a running start at the field?
For background, I have a PhD in Mathematics, specifically studying mathematical models of game theory and agents and ecological competition and stuff. So I know a bunch of game theory, but mostly use it for fitness gradients and incremental behavior adjustments that head towards an equilibrium over time rather than rational agents solving explicit mathematical formulas. And I have very little experience with actual economic theory aside from what I've picked up here and there from being in tangential spaces. Supply and demand curves and basic stuff like that. I'm considering branching out and potentially moving towards jobs that involve actual economics, but feel somewhat underqualified at the moment given that I've never taken a single formal economics class in my life. Or at the very least it would be fun to learn more stuff about it and potentially learn ideas that I could use in my current research even if I'm still focusing mostly on biological organisms.
So I'd like to learn from a source that doesn't require specific background knowledge of words or formulas that econ students would already know as prerequesites, but also respects my intelligence and mathematical skill so doesn't try to handhold me through easy stuff, fastforwarding or skipping the actual basics and starting me somewhere interesting where I can actually learn new stuff.
The almost universal graduate textbook for microeconomic theory is Mas-Collel, Whinston, and Green. It is very comprehensive. Despite being a graduate textbook, you don't need any prior economic training to understand it. However, it is dry and abstract and not strong in developing motivation or economic intuition. Hal Varian's Intermediate Microeconomics is a good undergrad textbook that does those things better but is much less rigorous and does more handholding on the math. (Don't confuse this with Varian's more advanced "Microeconomic Analysis.") I would start with a quick read of Varian's Intermediate Micro and move on to MWG if you want more.
What sort of jobs are you looking at?
More options
Context Copy link
Marginal revolution have free online courses, but I haven't taken them and can't vouch for them
https://mru.org/
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link