This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm not familiar with this National Action, so I looked them up. Everything about them is written with negative mood affiliation so it should be easy to find out how nasty these people are. The results I think are further evidence this is fake, aside from the insanity of a group like this identifying themselves in a threat, they've never done anything like this before. In fact, actual crimes committed by members are fit a easy to discern pattern. The majority of arrests of members of the National Action are for....being members of the National Action. Apparently the UK can forbid membership in groups like this with criminal penalties apart from actually committing crimes. I'm not British though so what do I know, maybe most folks in the UK like laws like this. IMO status offences enshrined in law are no better than the beliefs the proscribed groups are advancing. Its illegal to simply exist while claiming to be a member. The next biggest bucket of arrests are for words, either spoken or written. None of it is paper letters mailed to people or direct threats against specific individuals. Mostly its internet shit-posting in support of the actual crimes of non-members, like the murder of an MP. While they were 100% uninvolved in the murder there is a desperate need to connect them in the UK press. Also it appears that being a proscribed group puts you outside the protection of the UK's already insane libel/slander laws (nothing on Japan's though). The only actual crime that I would consider a real crime, in that it did demonstrable damage to a person or property, was an attempted murder by someone claiming to be a member after the fact. Some one was also arrested for possessing items with the intent of damaging property but was never charged for it. This simply isn't their MO at all. In addition, since the majority of their crimes are for saying or typing illegal words, there is a pretty good corpus of their work. None of it is written anything like this letter. They write like chavs speak, likely for an obvious reason.
Besides the fact that they're called National Action, I, and I suspect most other Brits, have no issues with organisations like this being proscribed because they aren't just racist and anti-semitic, they're outright calling for the murder of Jews and other minorities which crosses a pretty clear line.
From the Wikipedia article;
On whether it's a hoax, I mean obviously I have no way of knowing but I don't see why it's implausible; the sort of basement-dweller who might join a organisation like this seems exactly the sort of person to write a poorly written screed such as this.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link