This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The fundamental problem is that Palestinian social and political organization makes them an impossible group to deal with. They raise their issues by killing civilians, so the only thing they have to trade is an offer to stop killing civilians. And that is something their sociopolitical structure cannot deliver. They don't have a unitary government, and both their governments are former/current terrorist organizations, and both contain active terrorist arms. If they crack down too much, a new organization just forms and starts killing jews. Essentially, whoever is killing people is the government of Palestine.
Israel has its atrocities and shady dealings and all sorts of corruption, but it's the same sort of thing every country has. A government is force, theft and violence. Any other country in Israel's place would have ethnically cleansed or essentially imprisoned all the Palestinians decades ago, and we know this because all the other countries that had a population of them did that. Lebanon, Jordan, Egypt.
The Israelis suppress the Palestinians by killing civilians, regularly, including their government leaders, and in far greater numbers.
In fact, blatant terrorism is how Israel was formed to begin with.
If Israel kills enough Palestinians, including gutting their "leadership" by killing them, a new organization forms and "starts" killing Jews.
Well yeah, that's typically how people being killed respond.
When Israel does this, it's justifiable or at least understandable. When hardline leaders and governments are elected in response to Palestinian attacks, and starts killing Palestinians, it's justifiable or at least understandable. When Palestinians do anything remotely similar, it's terrorism. When Israel kills government leaders leading to people taking over who will respond to those killings, it's even more evidence of terrorism or whatever.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link