This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Thanks for all the info, looks like I've got a bunch of reading to do.
You switched from square to cubic meters halfway through there, but 2ha= 20000m^2, x15 gives us 300k, so the pit would have to be two and a third time's as deep as those in the UK. Seems within reason.
If there are chunks of bone just laying around, why is nobody digging these sites? We can reconstruct the details of massacres from ten thousand years ago, why is nobody trying to do the same here while evidence is still easy to gather?
The idea that it would be "disrespectful" is ridiculous if there are body parts laying on the surface unburied. Surely someone should be willing to fix that, right?
Recently a memorial was established in Russia at the site of the Kommunarka "firing range" (google translate seems to handle this okay, there were a few sources in English but most were sparser) where several thousand people were shot and buried during the purges in the late 30s. The locations and dimensions of the mass graves were established through ground radar, soil samples, topographical survey, and other non-invasive methods, without any actual excavation. Revisionist methodology would insist on doubt that anyone was ever shot or killed at Kommunarka since the bodies weren't dug up and counted (in fact these are pretty much the same methods used by Andrej Kola at Belzec in the 90s and by Caroline Sturdy-Colls at Treblinka a few years ago, and revisionists did immediately insist that the lack of full excavations was extremely suspicious).
In Cambodia, while some of the mass graves from the Pol Pot era have been dug up, most have not been, and when researchers decided to try and get a count of how many people had died during the Khmer Rouge genocide they mostly relied on witness testimonies and non-invasive surveys of the grave-sites rather than excavations.
I don't think it's really "standard protocol" so to speak to dig up all mass graves of a mass-killing event.
I don't really see the purpose of digging up places like Treblinka. It's naturally more sensitive than massacres from hundreds or tens of thousands of years ago. The only real purpose would be to placate Holocaust deniers and I don't blame the people in charge of these sites for not being prioritizing that.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link