This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Alternatively, various parts of the state regulate certain aspects of human life to the general benefit of the population. The examples are intended to seem 'beneficial', 'narrow-in-scope', and 'widely accepted by the population', while being about as totalitarian as mask mandates by your arguments
I don't think there's a sizeable minority in the US right now that considers the FDA's oversight over edible food, the DoT's oversight over cars, or or taxes totalitarian. Even those who think taxes are too high do not think 'taxes' themselves are bad. If you meant 'sizeable minorities in the past', sources / elaborate?
If you read 1984 or any authoritarian dystopia story, you'll notice stuff like 'children are trained in school to inform on their parents' dissent, and parents are jailed if they dissent', 'any public speech mildly criticizing the state is banned', 'eating government-provided gruel', 'your job is assigned to you by the state and if you don't do it, labor camp'. One might call that 'totalitarian'. Even in ... China, the hukou system, political censorship, a lot of the economy being state owned, the party's level of general power, and maybe their covid response are - while I wouldn't say totalitarian - clearly are much more 'central power' and 'state being mean to the population' than exists in the US. And calling the US 'totalitarian' in the same way you would call China totalitarian or Oceania totalitarian ... does the word even mean anything?
Again, 'maybe you get banned from twitter, but you can still make $500k/year on substack' and 'the stasi tortures you' are not comparable. The former is bad! But it isn't 'punishing any person who speaks against any of it'. And nobody's being banned off social media for criticizing excess regulation, republicans have been doing that for half a century.
For 'leaving house, groceries, participate in life', as far as I'm aware in the US, only masks were ever required. For work - you can argue that's a bad thing on the state's part, but it's a trillion times less authoritarian than a national draft, which we had in 1973.
From wikipedia:
Sure, but then it is physically impossible to not indoctrinate children. Which casts doubt on the claim!
Gay marriage isn't "enforced", it lets, like, gay couples get tax benefits. Gay couples could, and did, still say they were "married", and that was generally accepted. A totalitarian state might decree that particularly attractive twinks are forcibly married to gay inner party members. That might be totalitarian! Gay marriage is as mild as it gets.
Was life ever less centralized than it is today? When?
the main point of my comment was to discuss how one can pull nearly any particular facet out of a totalitarian system, discuss only that one facet, and then argue it's not totalitarian because by your definition totalitarian would need to be all-encompassing, and that this argument is therefore disingenuous
you seem uninterested in that discussion and instead want to claim?/imply I'm equating any individual facet I describe as totalitarian with any other facet; claiming there cannot be any degrees within totalitarianism (after all, 1984 is totalitarian therefore the US cannot be); and that China, including their citywide lockdowns, are not totalitarian to you, but "more central power" than the US therefore the US cannot be totalitarian
it's clear we have such a wide chasm between what I would consider totalitarianism and what you consider totalitarianism there isn't much point in discussing that aspect
Do you think prison is totalitarianism for the inmates? Supermax? Max? Solitary confinement?
the claim was "Children are being, from our point of view, indoctrinated in Federally funded State schools with State-approved ethnic and sexual dogma: straight bad, white bad."
it seems to me the word "indoctrination" is defined there to mean "indoctrination with substance I dislike," so I think you're right here
I agree children will be indoctrinated with something no matter what and the argument is over what to indoctrinate them with. The "woke" use positions in institutional power to indoctrinate them into believing opinions which are not held by the majority in society.
pretty much any point post ww2 to now and then post ww1 to ww2 and then post civil war to ww1 and then before that with each spike of centralized control (the wars) still being less centralized than today
I am honestly perplexed how one could even argue otherwise with perhaps some quibbling over specific points in ww1 and ww2 compared to now.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link