This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Do you want "a say" or do you want to decide, because if all you want is a say you are free to vote for representatives who will oppose aid for Ukraine just as I am free to vote against them. If you want to decide, well tough shit, it's not your call to make.
For my part I find the moral/political arguments against providing Aid to Ukraine repugnant and the to cost/limited recourses unconvincing. Something like 30 Billion dollars might sound like a lot in absolute terms (and it is) but it is quite literally pocket change when viewed in the context of the wider US Federal budget. For comparison It's about twice what the Obama administration was spending a year on solar power subsidies and less than a tenth of what the Biden Administration has proposed spending on student loan forgiveness. Furthermore, as far as government expenditures go this one seems to offer a pretty large and immediate ROI. Seems to me that reinforcing the post WWI norm of "don't invade your neighbors" while simultaneously undermining a significant geo-political rival and diminishing a clear and present threat to our allies would be a worth while at several times the price.
As an aside did you know that a lot of munitions, especially the larger more complicated stuff like like artillery rounds, missiles, etc... have a shelf life? Sure that shelf life is measured in decades and our ability to spin up new production on a moment's notice might not be what it used to be, but a lot of the stuff we've been sending Ukraine was looking to be scrapped anyway and maybe I'm just being weirdly irrational and sentimental but I feel that it's only "proper" to dispose of a missile by launching it rather than sending it to the scrap heap.
More options
Context Copy link