Have you found a problem in the site? Do you want to make a suggestion on improvement? Do you just want to say "hi everyone"? Post it here!
If you'd like to help with development, check out the Github and the dev Discord. We have a practically infinite list of small things that need to be fixed or changed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I'm not totally convinced that's going to stick around, for the record; I think Reddit-esque upvotes/downvotes are a good way to end up with echo chambers. That change exists because it's what the new site does and I haven't changed it back, but if anything I'm probably going to go even more abstract than Reddit did, which I know is going to make some people unhappy.
I appreciate the forecast and explanation. I disagree with removing votes, but only weakly. Votes reflect (among other things, and poorly) the effort level of a post, and thus showing higher-voted comments first improves the reading experience of the site. Votes aren't necessary for an echo chamber: ideological conformity can be enforced with social pressure (by getting lots of disagreeing replies). Without votes, we'd rely on mods more heavily to police low-effort comments. (Which isn't necessarily a bad thing, I suppose. Informally, most votes on the current CW thread look like the sort of votes you're trying to avoid.)
Other sites have various technical bodges that I hope might suffice instead of removing votes entirely. Hacker News and Lobste.rs require a fair amount of karma (500 for HN) to unlock downvotes, and Lobste.rs requires reasons to be selected from a menu for downvotes on posts. Furthermore, HN prevents you from downvoting direct replies to your comments or comments more than 24 hours old, and has a minimum score of -4 (beyond which downvotes don't change the score). Slashdot's M2 system offers a different route, perhaps one far too baroque for current Internet users. For an even wilder idea, maybe we could cap comment scores at +1/-1, and have all scores start at 0? Anyway, I think, but can't justify, that voting and tree structure go hand-in-hand, and I worry about removing one but not the other.
For what it's worth, I'm not planning on removing the concept of votes - I wrote more about that here, but the tl;dr is I think they're a great way to get people invested in the site. But I might add some extra abstraction between "I pushed 'up' or 'down'" and "this made the number go up and down by exactly one".
Those are actually some pretty interesting ideas. I'm gonna write those down and maybe adopt some of them.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link