site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  1yr ago (text post)   28144 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 26, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

11
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Because I am one. I'm a zillenial (I'm 25). I tend to interact with people 20-25 more than 25-30. And I use more social media than I should. Also play CSGO a lot, which is mostly under '20s.

If you want to keep up with the kids, just scroll TikTok a bit and read through the comment sections, you will pick up their slang pretty fast. Localized slang isn't much of a thing anymore. It's all universal TikTok slang. Even kids in remote parts of the world are using TikTok slang.

Luckily I've managed to resist TikTok, Twitter and Instagram so far. It's not worth it to me to delve in just to keep up with slang I guess. Alas.

Yeah, it's not worth it at all. It's really amazing how vapid most of the content is. Atleast with TV shows you consume some "culture" or learn a thing or two here and there, similarly with Youtube but to a lesser extent. Short-form videos are just pure stupidity all around.

And the algorithm doesn't help with that either.

similarly with Youtube but to a lesser extent

With YouTube it really really depends on how careful you are in what you watch. I've learned a little new physics, a little new engineering and mathematics (my own fields, embarrassingly!), a lot of history, a ton of music theory ... but even for those mostly-dry subjects the Dreaded Algorithm tries to push clickbait (including some obvious-to-even-an-amateur nonsense in the case of engineering news!), and I fear to even hate-click or morbid-curiosity-click on the thumbnails of anything that looks like it might be clickbait, lest some machine learning conclude that I'm really interested in "Why Starship Is Going Nuclear" level garbage after all and crowd out new channels I might actually benefit from. A raw search on a new subject, presumably less filtered by whatever "stop recommending nonsense" I've trained into their algorithms, rarely comes up with anything as useful as I could find by searching web pages and forums instead and coming across YouTube links elsewhere.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats