This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
If we can't define "what is a woman?" then why the hell is John so adamant that he is really a woman and not a man? That he doesn't 'feel' like a man but does 'feel' like a woman? I might claim I feel like a unicorn, but very few people are going to accept that it is true that I am a unicorn.
If a woman is a category as non-existent as a unicorn, why not simply tell John "you're a guy in a dress who wears makeup and wants to be called a different name, okay fine" rather than "Why beautiful stunning and valid Jane you are indeed truly a woman".
By the "biology no real" definition, I could define a chair as a woman. After all, if you don't need real tits, real vagina, and lack of womb and ovaries no barrier to being a woman, why not a chair that doesn't possess any of these characteristics either? Me and Diogenes there with his plucked chicken, we fucking dare you. Look, this chair has a beautiful wig and gold necklace and dress, why don't you say she is a real woman too?
As for the exclusion of trans men (1) up until recently there were many more trans women than trans men (2) if a five foot one inch guy with broad hips and no muscles goes into a traditionally male space and tries to start shit, there's much less fear of cis men getting hurt. A six foot 'woman' with a functioning dick in traditionally female spaces, on the other hand, can be - the happy mother? father? of two babies by female inmates 'she' was put into the same prison with:
Oh yeah, the 30 year sentence was for this:
But I guess gunpoint carjackings and brutal murders are only "a misandrist view that men are inherently dangerous", right?
More options
Context Copy link