This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Why did you not post the reason for that, which is that these accounts were posting or linking to the real time location of Elon Musk (and in some cases, inadvertently his children)?
As Musk put it,
This is absolutely true. If I had an account tracking the location of the editors of NYT, and one of my followers even blocked their car and jumped on their windshield wearing a mask, I would be: fired from any corporate job, investigated by the FBI, sued for harassment, have my own death threats against me, doxx’d by the NYT (including location of my home), and so on.
I think Elon Musk has greater chances of being killed by a left-wing vigilante than anyone else in America, because he’s now controlling what they previously controlled. There’s no substantive argument for why a person’s real time location should be shared publicly.
It was also the same link for a substantial amount (possibly all) of the suspended accounts.
These people talk to one another. It may have been coordinated with the intent of creating a news story about Elon banning liberal journalists.
More options
Context Copy link
I love it. These media narcissist were the biggest whiners, pressuring Twitter into selectively enforcing rules, or writing new ones1. Not that I think Twitter needed to be pressured that much. They are used to effectively writing the rules, not having them enforced on them. For many of them, this sort of unearned class privilege is all they've ever known. I wouldn't be shocked if many of them became "journalist" just to bask in it. Their lamentations are totally worth $44B of someone else's money.
More options
Context Copy link
I don't think the other poster said that they posted a real-time map of his car. (Such things do exist, but they're mostly behind-closed-doors at the car manufacturers and Apple for now.)
Presenting the flight records in real-time and likely landing spots do have risks. There are certain realities of private aviation that make securing things hard, and that mean someone paying attention from the ground can usually identify all the cars from a specific aircraft's passengers for anything smaller than Oshkosh, with a significant time advantage on them actually leaving the FBO office or tarmac. ADS-B Exchange has this data, but it's notoriously obnoxious to use, even for aviation people (and it's controversial among aviation people).
There's a better author than I with a pretty long piece on the ethics of this sorta thing. On net, I'm against a policy treating this as doxing (or otherwise bannable), but I don't think it's nearly as straightforward or banal as first glance.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link