This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
For the most part, yeah, although with the added caveat that our demographic isn't just age, but class and education. Like so many others in our general grouping, I had a mixed-gender friend group and never really had all that much trouble finding relationships, right up until I met my wife. Our friend group remains mixed-gender, but it's now a mixed-gender group of people that are either married or look like they're about to be. The whole Tinder scene just looks like an absolute hellscape to me from the perspective of a guy that missed that timeline by a few years. Sure, we had to experience the real-life version of being swiped-left, but at least it usually came with some sort of interpretable feedback that was more actionable than just swiping into the Tinder void.
That said, I came from a rural, lower-class environment originally, and it seems like a fair bit of my age cohort wound up with broken marriages or out-of-wedlock children. The people that escaped via academics and wound up with decent jobs all seem to have done decently well for themselves romantically and maintained quite a bit more stability. I suspect that this is probably pretty common in the new Zoomer demographics too - the scientists, engineers, attorneys, accountants, and so on will probably do basically fine romantically.
More options
Context Copy link