site banner
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your model of what could happen is the trust that is inherent in all your actions.

You are wrong. The word trust means to "rely on", I don't rely on her not calling the police, that's something you assume, but you don't know my mental state, only I know that, and I'm telling you emphatically that I do not rely on that. You think you can read my mind, but you can't.

you don't know my mental state

I don't have to - I know about human behavior enough to know that a person who thinks asking a woman out would end up with him murdered or in jail, would not ask a woman out (unless he's suicidal or wants to end up in jail as part of his plan to become the next Count of Monte Cristo, but I trust/hope/assume that's not what you are).

You think you can read my mind, but you can't.

I don't need to, if I can observe your behavior and if I can assume you not entirely unlike a typical human. Of course, if you are an alien sent to Earth with the specific purpose to troll me, I'd be wrong every time.

I know about human behavior enough to know that a person who thinks asking a woman out would end up with him murdered or in jail

Which has absolutely nothing to do with what I think.

I don't need to, if I can observe your behavior and if I can assume you not entirely unlike a typical human.

Converse error fallacy.