site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of November 14, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

12
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Your division of "you" and "we" in this comment obscures your misunderstanding, I think. Many, maybe all of the people you seem to think you're addressing presumably agree that fictional abuse is preferable to real abuse. But that doesn't mean they're comfortable accidentally seeing it, and it definitely doesn't mean that profit-seeking companies are comfortable having it floating around in their social media ecosystems, where it might lead to bad press or a userbase exodus. The same is true of many categories of pornography that don't raise any age-of-consent issues at all. Torture porn, scatological porn, even non-pornographic materials depicting violence, may all be totally fictitious and yet they will often be censored.

The goal is not to stop you, personally, from doing something objectionable, though in some cases censorship might contribute to that end. The goal is to create welcoming, profitable semi-public spaces that will not attract pitchfork-wielding mobs.

Well perhaps I am confused, but it seems to me like most people communicating "This is a good thing actually." mean it in regards to fundamental moral concerns, not concerns of expediency, convenience, or compliance. But I do acknowledge that many (even pedos in some cases) may hold apparently censorious views for those reasons. After all, if even I ever started up a social media platform that somehow attained any sort of popularity, even I would have to sadly pretend sufficiently enough to vigorously oppose the pedophilic content on it.

The goal is to create welcoming, profitable semi-public spaces that will not attract pitchfork-wielding mobs.

That's the goal of their owners. I'm not sure why their users should care.