Changing someone's mind is very difficult, that's why I like puzzles most people get wrong: to try to open their mind. Challenging the claim that 2+2
is unequivocally 4
is one of my favorites to get people to reconsider what they think is true with 100% certainty.
2+2 = not what you think
felipec.substack.com
- 204
- -34
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
And who decides the correctness of my position? You. So in order for me to be able to convince you that
X
may be true, I first have to convince you thatX
may be true, butX
cannot be true, because you have decided that the position thatX
may be true is not correct, why? BecauseX
cannot be true.How is this not the definition of circular reasoning?
The correctness of your position is a matter of fact. No one decides it, we research it. I have done so and found out it's not correct. If I happened to be wrong about that, there would be convincing counterarguments you could make, proving me wrong. But I notice you're not even trying to argue X anymore.
It's the definition of a strawman. I have not made the circle of reasoning you describe. I have proven that X is not true, separately.
According to you.
So, according to you, math is a matter of opinion?
Math is not a mater of opinion, what math says is a matter of opinion.
No, math is abstract truth. If the application ever becomes an issue, you're looking to apply math to another field.
In any case, the statement in question is a straightforward arithmetic equation. There's no room for interpretation here.
You are not math, you are a person interpreting what math says.
There is nothing to interpret, it's straightforward math. I'm merely writing it down.
That's your opinion. Everything is interpreted.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link