This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
It's embarrassing, really. They just have to acknowledge biology for the 5min it takes to write the definition. Is doublethink that hard, or does doing so threaten their social standing or something?
Well, I got none to lose, so why not?
A woman is a human who fits into a cluster typified by certain traits, such as 2X chromosomes, female reproductive organs (vagina, Ovaries, uterus, etc), breasts shaped to emphasize mammaries, the ability to lactate, conceive gestate and give birth to offspring, or else menstruate when not gestating, and to have achieved physical maturity (maximum height, full development of the mentioned features, etc.
The "cluster [...] typified by" part is how you include XY women, metapausal women, women with mastectemies or hysterectemies, and trans women. We're supposed to be good at word-games; can't we just, IDK, italicize cluster and typified by to make it clear that those are the cheatcode, and so that their friends can see what they're up to instead of canceling them like "OMG you said all women can have babies but what about metapausal XY women with hysterectemies?".
Cause, like, if it's that last thing, fair enough, but you do kinda forfeit the claim to being the smart team under those conditions. But if my experience is anything to go by ... yeah, it's that one. :(
More options
Context Copy link