This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The written deal on offer at that meeting, to the best of our knowledge, was that Zelenskyy signs a mineral deal which in expectation transfers value from Ukraine to the US, and gets nothing in return. Trump was explicitly not offering any kind of security guarantee or military assistance, and can't offer a ceasefire because negotiations between Trump and Putin are still at the talking-about-talks stage. Zelenskyy had successfully negotiated the negative economic EV of the deal down to a de minimis level, and was in Washington to sign a mostly-irrelevant mineral deal as a confidence-building measure.
Assuming all parties were acting sensibly rather than having a destructive snit, something happened immediately before or during the press conference that made it clear that the mineral deal - or rather the as yet unwritten deal that the mineral deal was a confidence-building step towards - didn't work. And it is fairly obvious what that disagreement was. The two key negative turning points are when Trump asks Zelenskyy to come out in favour of a ceasefire (Zelenskyy is quite properly unwilling to do anything that reads as committing to support a US-negotiated ceasefire until he knows what it might look like) while Zelenskyy asks Trump to promise further military support against Russia if Russia misbehaves (which Trump has made clear he doesn't want to do). The disagreement is that Trump sees the end goal as Ukraine agreeing to a ceasefire negotiated between the US and Russia, and Zelenskyy sees the end goal as changing the balance of power such that Russia might plausibly agree to a ceasefire on reasonable terms.
More options
Context Copy link