site banner
PaperclipPerfector  2d ago (text post)   12798 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 3, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

5
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

1: Historic L.A. Jewish deli hit with antisemitic graffiti

Okay, but the graffiti shown says "Free Gaza", "How many dead in the name of Greed?" and "Israel's only religion is capitalism". All of these are congruent with the claim that "America enabling Israel's treatment of Gaza is what's being protested."

2: D.C. kosher restaurant vandalized on Kristallnacht anniversary

I don't see a culprit mentioned or any evidence for a motive given, is it your contention that Leftists are commemorating Nazi events by targeting Jewish businesses? Does that even seem like it would be on the top 5 Occam's Razor reasons for a window getting smashed in crime filled DC?

3: Brick thrown through window of popular Jewish deli in Tarzana

Nearly identical incident as 2, except this time in LA.

The owner, David Laredo, told Eyewitness News he isn't sure whether it was a targeted attack.

"It's possible with... what's going on today everywhere," he said. "It's possible... but nothing was left that indicates that it was a hate crime... I don't know."

4: Antisemitic mob targets Jewish falafel restaurant in Philadelphia

These protests were started by employees (who presumably aren't anti-semitic enough to not work at a falafel restaurant) who were upset that the owners - Israeli citizens - were donating restaurant profits directly to Isreal. Link

5: 'Same as the KKK': New SJP-affiliated group works to remove Hillel from US campuses

Subtitle:

Drop Hillel claims to be campaigning for non-affiliated Jewish spaces without Zionist connections.

Drop Hillel calls itself a “Jewish-led campaign... advocating for divestment from Hillel” that wishes to “weaken Hillel’s grip on Jewish campus life.”

The call is coming from inside the house.

So when you protest the actions of, say, the Chinese government in West Turkestan/Xinjiang, the appropriate action is to vandalize the local Szechuan takeaway joint just because it happens to be run by a coethnic? That's stupid.

And yes, there are mostly-secular "as-a-jews" who have fully-aligned with the progressive quasi-religion. This is not new; this was the story of the Trotskies and the Kurt Eisners and the Bela Kuns and the Rosa Luxemburgs, and it's now the story of the Peter Beinarts and Norman Finkelsteins, and even much of the modern Reform movement, which, not-unlike many of the mainline protestant denominations, has broadly de-sacralized and merged into the general progressive mainstream. Not for nothing has it been called "the Democratic Party at prayer". These folks are tokens in the anti-zionist movement providing identitarian PR cover the same way Robin DiAngelo and other "white-privileged allies" are for the "antiracist" movement.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats