site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of March 3, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

7
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I don’t think a nuclear conflict is necessarily likely, but a conventional engagement over Taiwan has a much much higher chance at spiraling out of control than the Ukraine War does for a few reasons.

  1. Any invasion of Taiwan is going to start with a massive blockade of the island. The US can’t just sit back and ship over ammo and weapons systems. If the US decides to intervene it would require directly engaging the Chinese fleet in a way that ensures thousands of deaths on both sides in a very short period of time. Keep in mind one aircraft carrier going down with all hands would cause more deaths than 9/11.

  2. The time scale here is brutally fast compared to Ukraine. Everyone knows where everyone else’s ships and bases are. This isn’t like Midway where the fleets are going to take weeks to find each other. Both sides have extremely long range weapons and could start hitting fleets and bases within minutes of a conflict starting. One side could find itself effectively losing the conflict in a matter of hours. This vastly increases the risk of panic and the use of tactical nuclear weapons to try and even things out.

  3. Using a tactical nuclear weapon on a fleet in the middle of the ocean has effectively zero risk of civilian casualties, so there is a much better psychological excuse for the early launches than you would have for a land war.

  4. There’s a hell of a lot more money on the table. Between the chip fabs in Taiwan and control of the South China Sea, one side is coming out of this economically ruined. Adding to the pressure, both the American and Chinese stock markets are going to immediately get heemed the minute the conflict starts, creating an intense pressure to get this over with fast.