site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 24, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The USMLE is necessary but not sufficient, other stuff is required to be a competent doctor (and NPs/PAs certainly become doctors without passing the USMLE, and while not actually good enough certainly make some people comfortable).

Preparation side of things gets weird, these days most applicants use uniformly the same few "best in class" test prep resources like Sketchy and First Aid, hypothetically someone could pass the USMLE without the structure and context of course work but it would be nearly impossible because of the sheer amount of crap you need to know.

As you know but the other poster likely doesn't, a lot of what is involved in being a good doctor involves practical experience doing shit in the hospital (sometimes physical skills and the like) with training wheels for awhile before you do it on your own.

You don't want your first time doing X to be doing it by yourself with no supervision, it's a terrifying thought.

Incidentally some states in the U.S. do allow lawyers to became barred without law school but I don't know the details of that.

Can't really do that in the same way for medicine.

Lastly it's entirely possible to pass USMLE and be ass as a physician for a variety of reasons including skills atrophying and laziness.

I believe you. It's not like the PLAB doesn't occasionally let absolute lemons through, and I wish I could say that every doctor with the same nominal degree I have was someone I'd entrust my medical care to.

God knows that I've sometimes felt scared and befuddled by how much autonomy the UK saw fit to grant me, back in India it was far too easy to hide behind a consultant's skirt, but that's not really a possibility when the senior psychiatrist hasn't had to interpret a CXR longer than I've been alive. I personally think it's nigh miraculous how doctors once managed without ready access to the internet.

They used to have less shit they could do so it was easy to have everything memorized aka we used to do jack shit, especially overnight (and reference textbooks are a thing!).

Also like 50 medications total lol.

Reminder that the treatment for a heart attack used to be ETOH and that was the better option than the alternative (bedrest).

Hmm.. It seems to me that you're describing late 1960s and early 70s medicine, whereas what I had in mind was closer to early 90s, before computers and internet access were truly ubiquitous.

I think by then, most of medicine had solidified, or at least we wouldn't be too outraged at the state of knowledge.

My grandpa finished med school back when penicillin was the hot new thing, DNA hadn't been discovered. Hell, when he entered med school, the notion of surgeons specializing was rather novel. I think they were at General Surgeons, OBGYNs and orthopods when he finished med school, if not by the time he finished postgraduate training in gyne.

I presume that the understanding of anatomy was most of the way there. You're not going to discover a brand new organ past the 1950s (and recent claims of new organs are rather tenuous at best, is the discovery of a new part of the lymphatic system or some kind of fascia that important?). And surgery would definitely be a practical field above all else.

While I am exaggerating the amount of growth is still pretty rapid - compare the size of First Aid now with 20 years ago. You'd be shocked at how much has changed since the early 90s, especially with respect to over specialization.