site banner
PaperclipPerfector  5d ago (text post)   2780 thread views

Small-Scale Question Sunday for February 23, 2025

Do you have a dumb question that you're kind of embarrassed to ask in the main thread? Is there something you're just not sure about?

This is your opportunity to ask questions. No question too simple or too silly.

Culture war topics are accepted, and proposals for a better intro post are appreciated.

1
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

I think a sensible reaction to covid pandemic measures would be to demand governments provide far more evidence to justify a lockdown longer than a month.

My concern at this point is not justifying a lockdown more than a month. I believe there is now sufficient backlash on that particular subject.

My concern at this point is what other thing that might be demanded next time.

If I have a pilot who forgot to put the landing gear down, went through remedial training on the subject, and was reinstated, my concern is not so much the pilot forgetting to put the landing gear down a second time. That particular item has been well-established. My concern is moreso "what other things might the pilot have forgotten that weren't covered in the remedial training?" Same idea.

(This is why remedial training often covers far more than just the specific incident.)

If you really want to, there's always the option of litigation against government officials if you can prove they willfully lied.

Government officials often have immunity.

If they encouraged lockdowns when it became clear it wouldn't help, or overstated the benefits of vaccination (without the benefit of hindsight), then they should be accountable for the harm.

The burden of proof lies the wrong way for this to help in practice, as all of these are nigh-unfalsifiable.

Of course, if your intent is for this to be a bureaucratic tarpit then your job is done here. I sincerely hope that is not your goal.

Do you have better alternatives? At the end of the day, if you're unhappy with the government, then you need to elect a better government. I presume that it wouldn't be impossible to strip bureaucrats of their immunity if the laws was changed to reflect that. What else could I really advise, that someone shoot Fauci?

In a way, the new Republican government reflects the deep unrest with previous medical policy. RFK isn't a fan of vaccines.

The reason I advocate for governments having the ability to impose lockdowns and quarantines is because pandemics can be highly dangerous. Covid was initially believed to have a ~1-10%% CFR for the first few weeks, and on the higher end, the serious possibility of several hundred million people dying justifies some action be taken. I think a month is enough to narrow the CFR down, leaving aside the primary benefit of reducing spread.

pandemics can be highly dangerous.

Sure. So can lockdowns.

(How many routine medical procedures & tests were cancelled due to COVID lockdowns & overreactions? How many of those were the same ones that the Medical Consensus(TM) said were hugely important for health? Oh, the Medical Consensus(TM) has since suddenly shifted to saying no, those weren't helpful actually? Oh, the Medical Consensus(TM) has decided to classify all deaths with detectable levels of COVID as solely due to COVID, and now there is no evidence for increased death rates due to diseases that could have been caught via said procedures? How... convenient.)

(Hopefully not overly snippy. I had to go back and tone it down; hopefully I toned it down enough. Still sarcastic; hopefully not snippy.)

Do you have better alternatives? At the end of the day, if you're unhappy with the government, then you need to elect a better government.

Sidenote: if you've given me a 3sat problem and purported solution, expecting me to solve said 3sat problem just in order to point out that your purported solution does not actually satisfy all of the equations is inane.

In a way, the new Republican government reflects the deep unrest with previous medical policy.

Agreed.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats