This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The 70 year-old politicos aren't going to give anyone a chance to arrest them. The middle class bureaucrats aren't going to risk jail either without some cover.
The actual play would be to stoke enough rage amongst the general public and underclass for them to do it or provide cover for people with more to lose, at which point people can come out with the excuses used during BLM/Luigi frenzy: obviously it isn't ideal but there's a legitimate reason behind all of this we need to talk about, "language of the unheard" and all of that.
The problem, I think, is that significant swathes of the public simply don't care that much about minutiae around government departments. What this election seems to have shaken is the notion that these sorts of people actually represent the groups in whose name they seize power . Apparently it's taking them a while to find the rhythm again.
Even the drugged-out lumpenproles taking to the streets in 2020 were mostly acting because they knew they had official cover. Police that wouldn’t open fire on them, shady mystery funds that would immediately post their bail, political DAs that would recommend sub-minimum sentences, and a news media that would paint them as heroes. And I suspect many of them were receiving a salary for it.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link