site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of February 17, 2025

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

The "non self-lubricating" part made me wonder if Naomi King was a post-op transwoman.

I remember some Motters experiencing envy at Gaiman's escapades when they were revealed to the press (I still don't know the details of them like I mentioned), so are we dispositionally different than the male population at large or just more honest?

I think this is just normal variability. There are different vices and everyone has its own weak spot. There's no queue of businessmen willing to offer me multi-million bribes if I bend the law in their favor. There's also no queue of attractive women half my age willing to debase themselves for my amusement. But if there were, I am reasonably sure I wouldn't succumb to the first sin, simply because I feel that wielding lawful power righteously (fuck, I sound like a YA novel blurb) is a much greater reward, but I am not quite sure about a stunning female college student not being very particular about the origin and destination of various organic substances as long as it's me ordering her around. Thankfully, the only women hitting on me are at least my age and they are both less attractive than my wife and not obviously sexually adventurous, so my marriage vows are safe.

All these (mildly) famous people ending up in compromising situations are some or all of the following:

  • are confronted with much more immediate and actionable temptations
  • have much lower impulse control
  • have much stronger urges

I am sure there are people who are sufficiently monogamous that if they came home one day and their wife said, "there's a hot naked 18yo girl in the bedroom waiting for you, here's her notarized consent form. If you don't like this one, I'll get you another. If you think this is a trap, here's a notarized postnup agreement signed by me," they would sincerely tell her that while they enjoy the attention, she is the only woman they need in their life. But we don't get to hear spicy news about them. Well, maybe when they get arrested with literal suitcases of cash.

notarized postnup agreement signed by me

Sidenote: no longer sufficient in many cases.