This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Re: the tweets about Someone's Dad knew Somebody Else, that is and isn't sinister. It's not sinister because it's not some big planned out conspiracy, it's just family using contacts and networking to help out their kids, like most people would do if they needed to. Johnny is looking for a summer job while he's in college, Uncle Bob knows a guy in the field, Uncle Bob is Mom's brother so she asks him to ask his friend to give Johnny an internship.
It is sinister insofar as these are the kids of rich, or influential, or rich and powerful and connected people. So they have an immediate advantage over anybody else; when your dad is an old college pal of the head of the SEC, then you have an in that very few other people do, and you have access to the circles where there is a lot of money that they might be willing to send your way.
As for the rest of it, eh, Utilitarianism. I'm sticking with deontology 😁 There's such a thing as being so smart, you're an idiot. I can admire sticking to a position even when the hard conclusion comes out and people won't like it or you, but then you can go so far along the path as to reach the reductio ad absurdum and it would be a lot better to go "Okay, so far and no further".
More options
Context Copy link