This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Managed to do the questions thanks to @phailyoor's helpful copypasta below and the answer key someone posted still further. I got a 5/5 in the end, though the third one seemed quite ambiguous (insofar as none of the answers were a perfect fit, and several were almost the same level of imperfect).
Perhaps curiously, of all the tests I've encountered, I found the questions pretty similar to the reading comprehension section of the JLPT (obviously only useful for a small part of the audience here, but e.g. questions 8-12 of the N1 sample). They really seem to like doing a particular format where you are given a half-page essay by some cultural figure on some random topic (like crow intelligence, or whether historiography is too focussed on flashy happenings rather than the effort that went into preventing any such happenings) and then have to pick out one of four sentences that is most representative of the core premise or argument. Given that the JLPT seems to be required for foreigners to be employed by many Japanese companies, it seems notable that they would essentially sneak in a verbal intelligence filter on immigrants in this way.
I also got 5/5 but #1 had me nervous. It was so straightforward that I felt like there had to be some sort of trick I was missing.
In regards to #3, it’s marked as “logical reasoning” but I think it’s more of a “common sense” question. They want you to predict the most likely response that a reasonable person would give to this irl.
5/5! I had a similar fear of "this seems too easy I must be missing something" for some of these.
I do think for #3,C is actually the most logical answer, putting common sense aside. It's the most direct flaw with the union member's argument.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link