This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
Enough of them did to cause billions of damage, and enough of them did for me to see Amazon delivery trucks looted on the streets of my city, within walking distance of my house, and downtown storefronts being all boarded up. For me, instantly ending up in a third-world country where there's no law, safety or security is a very significant and unique event. The vast majority of Biden supporters saw it as a positive development and encouraged and protected the rioters, including Biden's VP personally fundraising to help them avoid responsibility.
"Equivalent" in what way? They occupied government buildings many times. They fought with the police many times. They disrupted official proceedings many times. They perpetrated political violence many times. Did they do exactly the same, to the tiny detail, as happened in J6? No, some details were different. The general picture though is consistent - the left has been deploying political violence - including breaching into government buildings, disrupting official procedures, fighting the police, setting fire to government and commercial buildings, and more - many times, for a long time. You can pretend not to see it as much as you want, it's still exists.
From Byrd's side? Doing absolutely nothing. The protesters were removed from that area by the police in very short time after shooting. If some people in the building felt unsafe, he could escort them into a different place. But there was no threat justifying using lethal force there.
There would be no scuffling - he is a large strong male and she is a 5 feet 115lbs woman, he could literally subdue her with one hand tied behind his back, while drinking a beer and tap-dancing at the same time. Not to mention she did not present any threat at all at the time of shooting.
No, I am saying they are way, way worse. But they are treated way, way better. The treatment of J6 protesters that did no worse than just walking through the Capitol or adjacent lawn, while often being directed there by the police, is nothing short of horrendous if you read the individual stories. People literally got their lives ruined for walking for a couple of minutes through a building. It is absolutely infuriating what the FBI did to them, and even more infuriating is that they did it for partisan political reasons only - most of those people weren't hardcore criminals (or any criminals at all), did not harbor and harmful intent and did not cause any damage. Objectively, their "crimes" deserved a ticket and a small fine, at best. Sure, there were some that fought the police and broke stuff - but the vast majority did not. And they were treated same or worse than Gitmo terrorists - they left actually cared about what was done to Gitmo terrorists and criticized the government for treating them too harshly, but J6 people were subjected to horrendous abuse which did not get any pushback to that at all. The only correct way to stop this abuse - even though nothing can undo the damage by now - is to pardon them all. Yes, that means also that a small group of people who did commit the violence would be pardoned too - it's a small price to pay for the cessation of this horrible ordeal.
More options
Context Copy link