This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This aspect of American legal environment is a prime example of failed incentive structure. It disincentivizes bringing to court evidence gathered obtained by violating citizens' rights, and nothing more. Thus the police may choose to use methods that violate rights and building the court case with parallel construction. Likewise, court cases that hinge on whether some procedural forms were followed in collecting evidence or testimony rather than whether the evidence is true and correct. Incentivizes rules-lawyering rather than finding justice.
I'd rather recommend sticking to system where defined violations are crimes that carry penalties as codified in the law -- or if some violations are deemed necessary for the functioning of the government, the cases for those violations are defined by the law.
Back to presidential pardons: sounds likely that instead of drawing the conclusion you propose, the courts and the government may learn a different lesson. There is zero direct incentives for increased respect for the law, more thorough investigations, or fairer punishments. Whether or not Biden's family-members were guilty of anything, or Jan 6 people received fitting punishment or not, everyone will note that the perhaps-crimes committed in service of the POTUS or favorably influence his re-election chances may be pardoned. In immediate future, the noblesse de robe will adapt to in anticipation how Trump will wield the pardon. Long-term, it incentivizes fights for the presidential throne to be more vicious.
More options
Context Copy link