site banner
naraburns  nihil supernum  2yr ago (text post)   32427 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 31, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

24
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

It's hard to tell if 'embalmers in the network' in that quote means 'one in five members' or 'five members total', so it's hard to tell what that means. But even correct conclusions can be supported by poor evidence, and it's entirely possible the clots in OP are noise (especially if he started noticing them now, as opposed to 2 years ago - will skim the video to check). Also, steven crowder is a good get for 'exclusive content' on rumble, and 871,071 Views is quite a few!

[at this point, i just watch the video, then decide to comment on the article instead]

The video links this article. (the guest in the video is named "John O'Looney!") It's probably more informative and takes less time to go through than the video (I'm listening to the video, and they put spooky music over their 'calls with local morticians'...). It's a ... very strange article! Between the hint hinting that it's the vaccine, a few clearly false claims provided by experts interspersed with a bunch of other believable but weird claims by experts, and the generally big if true nature of the claims. Point by point, I guess ...

He found that the clots are lacking key elements present in healthy human blood, such as iron, potassium, and magnesium, suggesting that they are formed from something other than blood.

... what? a blood clot that isn't formed from blood? I'm not sure how to evaluate the claim (they give 'evidence' based on mineral content later), but that doesn't seem that plausible? Maybe someone said something sensible and then the article writer interpreted it one way and decided to make a darkly foreboding paragraph? idk. (They imply many times later the clots are spike protein. If that was true, it'd be very easy to prove in a lab)

“Prior to 2020, 2021, we probably would see somewhere between 5 to 10 percent of the bodies that we would embalm [having] blood clots,” Hirschman told The Epoch Times. “We are familiar with what blood clots are, and we’ve had to deal with them over time,” he said. He says that now, 50 percent to 70 percent of the bodies he sees have clots.

Obviously, big if true (i.e., if the frequency claim is true of the significance claim - if 75% of bodies have one 1mmx1mmx1mm clot and .2% of bodies have "as long as a human leg or as a pinky finger" ones, and that was the status quo, that is different).

“They are not normal post-mortem clots but rather the long tiny strings may have been etiologic in the deaths, preventing circulation to those regions. Others have shown that the spike protein can and does unfold and form a different configuration, contributing to tight string-like bonded structures with longitudinal twisting as well as cross binding, visible by microscopy, each one measuring angstroms in diameter—it takes 254,000,000 angstroms to make an inch—a typical capillary is around 5 microns, so many strings are needed to occlude a vessel.”

Is this trying to imply that the spike protein is causing the clots? It's not actually saying that, and nothing about 'the spike protein makes structures' indicates that the clots are made of spike protein (lots of proteins have "cross binding" and "structures"), so the two sentences don't really connect

As the summer [of 2021] went on, COVID deaths were on the decline, but these clots were increasing in number. My suspicion is that the vaccine may be the cause of these strange clots. I realize that I am not a doctor nor am I a scientist, but I do know what blood looks like and I am very familiar with the embalming process that I have been doing for two decades

Hirschman sent the clots to a few pathologists and claims that some of them have “overlooked” them, probably due to fear of retaliation.

Even if the clots are real, trends in the rate over time are harder to detect than just a change from 'absent' to 'present', because the thresholds you're discriminating are lower, both in quantity and time, so each 'bin' has less 'data', and noise is magnified.

[different person] Hooker sees about 300 bodies a year, and has seen numerous clots of the same kind Hirschman has. He told The Epoch Times that “people are seeing these [clots], it’s just not Richard and me and Anna [Foster],” another embalmer. “I have people sending me photos almost every week of what they’re seeing,” Hooker said.

... alright

Hooker lives in a conservative, rural area, and from his observation, fewer of the people there have been vaccinated compared to those in big cities.

“At least 25 percent of what I was embalming would display a significant amount of clotting,” Hooker said.

Of course, everything is correlated with everything else when you change geographic reasons, so 'if the overall effect is real' that could have a number of causes. Another way to interpret this (correct or not) is that Hirschmann was the biggest noise blip, and as we get farther away from him the magnitude of the effect will decrease (25% vs 75%).

He also noted that some embalmers with lesser skill might not find the clots after draining and that pathologists who do autopsies on the bodies might not do a full check on the vascular system.

“The very large blood clots that are being removed before and after death are unlike anything we have ever seen in medicine,” Dr. James Thorp, a maternal-fetal medicine expert who has been observing anomalies in pregnant women and fetuses, told The Epoch Times. “The COVID-19 vaccine diverts energy away from the physiologic processes in the body towards the production of the toxic spike protein,” Thorp said. “This directs energy away from the normal process of internal digestion also known as autophagy. This results in protein misfolding and propagation of large intravascular blood clots and also a variety of related diseases including prion disease, Creutzfeldt-Jakob disease, amyloidosis, and dementias including Alzheimer’s and others. While it is possible that COVID-19 illness in itself could potentially contribute to these diseases, it is unlikely and if so the effect of the vaccine would be 100- to 1,000-fold greater than that of COVID-19 disease.”

Even if Thorp did have a coherent argument, the 1-paragraph blurb for the Epoch Times would still sound like this - but this doesn't make sense as is, COVID itself also "diverts energy away from the physiologic processes in the body towards the production of the toxic spike protein", probably moreso than the vaccine, the connection to the randomly named diseases is just not present, and the "the effect of the vaccine would be 100- to 1,000-fold greater than that of COVID-19 disease" is also just not justified at all

Thorp also (this is linked in the article) spoke about vaccine hurting pregnant woman earlier. IIRC data didn't bear that out, but i've already pressed a lot of keys writing this, so someone else can search that. (And - is there's somewhere I can just put in a few variations of 'miscarriage rate by week' and get an updated time series? Statistia has a few things but they're all old)

Dr. Sherri Tenpenny, who has been analyzing vaccine adverse reactions for about three decades, also thinks the clots have to do with amyloid proteins.

“It appears the answer is coming directly through that needle. Spike protein disease, leading to the deposition of amyloid in organs and filling up arteries and veins,” Tenpenny told The Epoch Times.

"who has been analyzing vaccine adverse reactions for about three decades" was strangely phrased, and - "Sherri J. Tenpenny is an American anti-vaccination activist who supports the disproven hypothesis that vaccines cause autism.[1] An osteopathic physician, she is the author of four books opposing vaccination" yeah.

It was a very interesting article in the sense that 'this is the kind of thing hundreds of thousands of conservatives are reading', but not a very interesting article in the sense of actually understanding if these clots are happening and how that matters.

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats