site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 24, 2022

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

20
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Do you think it is possible to win a Republican primary in a red state while supporting elective first-trimester abortions? I don't. That is why Dobbs is a political opportunity for the Democrats (as well as, obviously, a policy opportunity for pro-life Republicans). The pro-life right used to be able to define their big tent as "anyone who thinks Roe and Casey go too far - which as you point out includes the median voter in most developed democracies. But once they have to start governing, that ceases to be fudgeable. The gap between the median Republican primary voter (who is to the right of the median Republican because of differential turnout) and the median voter is not bridgeable, and either the Republicans will need to find a way of throwing their base under the bus without being primaried, or to take the heat from supporting an unpopular policy. (Allowing state-level referenda like the one that confirmed the legality of abortion in Kansas is probably the easiest way to do this).

The evidence from the rest of the world is that abortion is important enough that the median voter will get what they want in the end. I suspect that means elective first-trimester abortions in all but the reddest of red states. Their is also a (in my view slim) possibility that gerrymandered state legislatures will be able to enforce the preferences of the median Republican primary voter while telling the median voter to pound sand, but if that happens then those states are not democracies.