This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
So Julie Kelly is the major reporter on the right talking about J6 defendants.
Her articles are here, https://amgreatness.com/author/julie-kelly/
There's an in depth interview with her here, https://rumble.com/v1d0llb-sidebar-with-julie-kelly-and-day-3-bannon-trial-recap-viva-and-barnes-live.html
You might want to jump to about 20 mins in.
Getting specific detailed information together is going to take some time.
Thanks! I watched enough of the stream to hear Kelly mention Timothy Louis Hale-Cusanelli. This guy was indeed held without bail and then sentenced to 48 months in prison after a jury trial. I was very curious about why he was denied bail and why his sentence was so high. His motion for release was litigated around Mar 2021 and the government brief adds some potentially relevant details.
I think the only valid concern the government had was that Hale would try to destroy evidence or intimidate witnesses. He apparently was frantically trying to delete all his accounts and also dispose of clothing from that day and a flag pole used a javelin. Hale worked at a naval weapons center and had a security clearance, but his coworkers said they feared retaliation from reporting his antics because he was "crazy", probably because he would regularly show up to work in a Hitler mustache and make jokes about the holocaust.
Beyond that though, the government brief spends several pages describing how awful his politics are. I think that's protected speech that should have no bearing on whether he is released, but unsympathetic defendants make bad laws, and this guy sounded especially unstable and unhinged. The government successfully argued that his enthusiastic talk about "civil war" (see starting pg 19) should be considered in context of his clear Nazi political ideology.
But the reasons he was denied bail are largely orthogonal to the original issue I raised. Even a charitable reading of the statement of facts filed against him by the government doesn't really accuse him of engaging in violence on J6, but apparently "coordinating" other rioters to advance and also cussing at police officers. I think @anti_dan can plausibly argue that Hale was someone "held without bail for wandering in" but not "without them even proving that you knew it was illegal to be there".
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link