This seems a little bit of a joke post as I’m sure you read. It improves cognitive performance.
I’ve personally switched to more online phone reading than books and I’ve found other people like me have done the same. This Im not sure is a good thing versus reading more long form.
The thing is a lot of good information exists on twitter and blogs now. If you know how to use them.
This Im not sure is a good thing versus reading more long form.
The good news is that you can find some veryveryvery long-form stuff out there if you want.
(be warned, that last link is the longest single work of fiction in the English language, and it's not yet done; also the first few hundred thousand words are pretty rough)
Some of this stuff just can't be found in paper form, but I honestly don't have a problem with that, and I don't get why people are so obsessed with paper. Words are words; the medium is not the measure of quality, it's just a measure of convenience.
It is a measure that someone cared enough to invest paper in it. In my experience if something is printed, there's still the occasional godawful thing but it raises the 5th percentile substantially.
(also while I love the freedom that comes with writing a web novel, most of them would still benefit from an editor)
There is, of course, a lot of dreck on the web because it's so low-cost. But there's also the occasional gem that is not tainted by worldly concerns such as "having to appease a publisher".
This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a
court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to
optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.
The weekly Culture War threads host the most
controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are
appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy;
if in doubt, post!
Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts.
You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.
Why are you called The Motte?
A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently,
it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey",
originally identified by
philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial
but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens
this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for
the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired
propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."
On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.
New post guidelines
If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it.
A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts
such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a
submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).
Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or
significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
This seems a little bit of a joke post as I’m sure you read. It improves cognitive performance.
I’ve personally switched to more online phone reading than books and I’ve found other people like me have done the same. This Im not sure is a good thing versus reading more long form.
The thing is a lot of good information exists on twitter and blogs now. If you know how to use them.
The good news is that you can find some very very very long-form stuff out there if you want.
(be warned, that last link is the longest single work of fiction in the English language, and it's not yet done; also the first few hundred thousand words are pretty rough)
Some of this stuff just can't be found in paper form, but I honestly don't have a problem with that, and I don't get why people are so obsessed with paper. Words are words; the medium is not the measure of quality, it's just a measure of convenience.
It is a measure that someone cared enough to invest paper in it. In my experience if something is printed, there's still the occasional godawful thing but it raises the 5th percentile substantially.
(also while I love the freedom that comes with writing a web novel, most of them would still benefit from an editor)
There is, of course, a lot of dreck on the web because it's so low-cost. But there's also the occasional gem that is not tainted by worldly concerns such as "having to appease a publisher".
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link