This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
I don't see this being usable fuel, at least. The shooting of an insurance company CEO codes edgy left comparably hard as "transport-oriented teens" Facebook meme groups that pivoted to violent fantasies towards landlords. Any Cathedral cleric with the slightest social spidey sense (which is something that the job actually requires) will see that "the CEO shooter was actually a rightish rat" is much more likely to make right-wing rationalism attractive to edgy left-wing youths than it is to galvanise further opposition to right-wing rationalism.
More likely that the 3D-printed weapon angle will be played up significantly.
Agree on all accounts. Back when it was assumed the killer was some sort of leftist class warrior, he was getting praise heaped on him.
I saw this on Twitter and thought it was funny: "Beloved murderer canceled after old Tweets discovered"
Of course, reality is boring. He is neither right-coded or left-coded. He's just another crazy person. We honestly need to stop obsessing over the politics of lunatics as if what they say matters.
It is by no means clear that the killer is not some sort of leftist class warrior. Certainly other leftist class warriors are quite visibly lining up to support him in significant numbers, while rightist culture warriors are lining up to condemn him. If nothing else, how the wider public perceives the act is quite informative.
More options
Context Copy link
Just because he was crazy doesn’t mean that there isn’t a problem. Crazy people tend to respond violently to intense political and social pressures first, meaning that they are often the canaries in the coal mine of revolution and civil war. Their acts of flying off the handle also often end up raising the temperature of already tense situations to the point that sane people can begin to take up arms. John Brown was kind of a loon if you actually look at the things he wrote and said; and I suspect the guy who lit himself on fire in front of the Tunisian parliament building in 2011 wasn’t that sane either. But you see what happened after them.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link