site banner

Culture War Roundup for the week of December 2, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

4
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

WhiningCoil is correct in that the ACA means insurers make more money through larger claims. There's no downward pressure to reduce costs from insurance companies. When they destroy last year's plans and remake new ones (to get around ACA's maximum cost increases!) they just make them more expensive. There's no consequences for introducing a massive headache to everyone, every year, forever.

If your argument is that Obamacare increased premiums, you would expect to see the slope of the line increase after the ACA was passed, correct?

That's actually not my argument. I agree that the data shows premiums have continually outpaced inflation at the same horrific rate for the past 30 years. Obama promised that the ACA would reduce premiums. The CBO - which is trotted out as "non-partisan" by every NPC every time we're ramming through another enshittification mechanism through our legislature - predicted Premiums would drop by 13% by 2016.

Do you have any data about outcomes deteriorating?

The market competition we were promised was a lie. Instead we've watched massive mergers and regional monopolies emerge. Longer wait times, fewer services at urgent care, the death of the family practice, monopolies on software and technology, deductibles have tripled.

You can't just ask for data as a rebuttal - you would have to be blind to think the system is providing any more value for the money today then it did in 08.

In that vein, you and I both know that there's no "data" to point directly to a trojan horse, but the level of incompetence that the ACA has exhibited could easily count as malice. Almost every single promise was an outright lie, with perhaps the exception of covering the obese smokers who didn't have insurance. It's genuinely difficult to think of a more destructive force in the average american's health and wealth in my lifetime.