site banner
PaperclipPerfector  25d ago (text post)   34282 thread views

Culture War Roundup for the week of October 28, 2024

This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.

Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.

We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:

  • Shaming.

  • Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.

  • Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.

  • Recruiting for a cause.

  • Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.

In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:

  • Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.

  • Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.

  • Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.

  • Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.

On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.

6
Top Bottom Old Controversial Comments
Jump in the discussion.

No email address required.

Then in the classic Imperial Boomerang effect they take the tools field tested on the poor bastards in Palestine and eagerly apply them in cracking down on future dissenters in the UK, US, etc.

..that's really not a plausible take. The situation is incomparable, in addition, Palestinians are really, really not any smart.

wielded against some posters on this forum.

Why? If Trump wins, which seems likely, you get a smooth on-ramp for the China liberation war. Who is against that? Nobody likes China, save maybe a few expat Chinese. At least on Twitter, SV types are signalling pretty hard that they're up for the war on China.

..that's really not a plausible take.

Already been happening for ages, man. Numerous American police departments have had ongoing training and tech exchange partnerships with the Israeli government for years. Domestic police and law enforcement agencies rolling out what was first wielded against Iraq and Afghanistan onto US streets is old news. Every podunk pd has an MRAP now.

in addition, Palestinians are really, really not any smart.

If that's the level we're sinking to - [your demographic group] are a bunch of smelly morons.

Why? If Trump wins, which seems likely, you get a smooth on-ramp for the China liberation war. Who is against that? Nobody likes China, save maybe a few expat Chinese. At least on Twitter, SV types are signalling pretty hard that they're up for the war on China.

I have no idea what you are talking about or what it has to do with the topic at hand but it sounds like it'll involve a lot of radioactive fallout.

Every podunk pd has an MRAP now.

It's useless for them.

If that's the level we're sinking to - [your demographic group] are a bunch of smelly morons.

You said that- not me. PISA scores and results speak for themselves. Arabs underperform.

I have no idea what you are talking about or what it has to do with the topic at hand but it sounds like it'll involve a lot of radioactive fallout.

Probably, but that's not bad. Fallout decays fast.

It's useless for them.

Elaborate. I don't think the militarization of police is intended to prepare them with better tools for giving tickets and responding to DV calls, it's adopting tools that suck for actual policing but have blatant counterinsurgency applications.

You said that- not me. PISA scores and results speak for themselves. Arabs underperform.

Some circles debate whether [whatever your demographic is] even qualify as homo sapiens.

Probably, but that's not bad. Fallout decays fast.

Speak plainly about whatever you mean. All I can piece together is that whatever it is includes something about a war involving China.

You think small police departments around the US are going to get much value out of fucking MRAPs.

Bullshit.

You think Gaza experience will help American police oppress Americans - ignoring that Americans are far more heavily armed and have far, far less police officers than say, Europeans.

What are we even talking about?

What is this place?

This website is a place for people who want to move past shady thinking and test their ideas in a court of people who don't all share the same biases. Our goal is to optimize for light, not heat; this is a group effort, and all commentators are asked to do their part.

The weekly Culture War threads host the most controversial topics and are the most visible aspect of The Motte. However, many other topics are appropriate here. We encourage people to post anything related to science, politics, or philosophy; if in doubt, post!

Check out The Vault for an archive of old quality posts. You are encouraged to crosspost these elsewhere.


Why are you called The Motte?

A motte is a stone keep on a raised earthwork common in early medieval fortifications. More pertinently, it's an element in a rhetorical move called a "Motte-and-Bailey", originally identified by philosopher Nicholas Shackel. It describes the tendency in discourse for people to move from a controversial but high value claim to a defensible but less exciting one upon any resistance to the former. He likens this to the medieval fortification, where a desirable land (the bailey) is abandoned when in danger for the more easily defended motte. In Shackel's words, "The Motte represents the defensible but undesired propositions to which one retreats when hard pressed."

On The Motte, always attempt to remain inside your defensible territory, even if you are not being pressed.


New post guidelines

If you're posting something that isn't related to the culture war, we encourage you to post a thread for it. A submission statement is highly appreciated, but isn't necessary for text posts or links to largely-text posts such as blogs or news articles; if we're unsure of the value of your post, we might remove it until you add a submission statement. A submission statement is required for non-text sources (videos, podcasts, images).

Culture war posts go in the culture war thread; all links must either include a submission statement or significant commentary. Bare links without those will be removed.

If in doubt, please post it!


Rules


Recommended Posts And Communities

Recommended Realtime Chats