This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
The revisions themselves are not surprising and probably shouldn't be taken as strong evidence of anything in particular. But it's not a "nothingburger" when the news media, politicians, etc. use a negative number to "fact check" and excoriate opponents, only to later have that number instead turn out to be positive. Either the numbers mean something or they don't. If the numbers do mean something, then all the news corporations that said "Trump was wrong" should now be printing stories saying "sorry, turns out Trump was right." If the numbers don't mean anything, then all the original news stories saying "Trump was wrong" should have been laughed out of the room from the get-go. Publishing numbers widely because they make your opponent look maximally bad, then ignoring revisions to those numbers, just shows how much the corporate news media (sometimes, Fox News excepted) has straightforwardly become the propaganda arm of the Democratic Party.
That is far from a "nothingburger."
Not necessarily. In fact, because the revisions are so small the numbers mean pretty much exactly what they did before - and if they do mean anything, what they probably mean is 'crime didn't deviate from it's previous trajectory a great deal'. Of course, this in turn doesn't necessarily imply any conclusion about the impact of BLM/changes to police policy, as who knows, without it maybe crime would have gone down by some non-trivial amount. News media should report on the change, but it shouldn't change their conclusions about anything. Trump saying 'crime is only going up' is still not really a statement that can be justified by the statistics in all but the most trivial sense. Even post-revision the 2022 figures were similar to the 2021 and 2020 figures (notwithstanding the problems with the 2021 statistics). While some of the fact-checking on Republican rhetoric on crime was probably over-zealous, that rhetoric was still wildly misleading. There was no surge in crime as constantly espoused by Republicans. Anyone saying 'crime is plummeting' was lying too (even if the pre-revision stats had turned out to be correct), but I don't think anyone was following that line as prominently or as vociferously as Republicans pursued the reverse narrative.
Stuff like this;
is still utterly false. In fact 2023 crime is back down below 2019 levels. This proves nothing either because the margins are so fine. But Trump is and was wrong.
More options
Context Copy link
More options
Context Copy link