This weekly roundup thread is intended for all culture war posts. 'Culture war' is vaguely defined, but it basically means controversial issues that fall along set tribal lines. Arguments over culture war issues generate a lot of heat and little light, and few deeply entrenched people ever change their minds. This thread is for voicing opinions and analyzing the state of the discussion while trying to optimize for light over heat.
Optimistically, we think that engaging with people you disagree with is worth your time, and so is being nice! Pessimistically, there are many dynamics that can lead discussions on Culture War topics to become unproductive. There's a human tendency to divide along tribal lines, praising your ingroup and vilifying your outgroup - and if you think you find it easy to criticize your ingroup, then it may be that your outgroup is not who you think it is. Extremists with opposing positions can feed off each other, highlighting each other's worst points to justify their own angry rhetoric, which becomes in turn a new example of bad behavior for the other side to highlight.
We would like to avoid these negative dynamics. Accordingly, we ask that you do not use this thread for waging the Culture War. Examples of waging the Culture War:
-
Shaming.
-
Attempting to 'build consensus' or enforce ideological conformity.
-
Making sweeping generalizations to vilify a group you dislike.
-
Recruiting for a cause.
-
Posting links that could be summarized as 'Boo outgroup!' Basically, if your content is 'Can you believe what Those People did this week?' then you should either refrain from posting, or do some very patient work to contextualize and/or steel-man the relevant viewpoint.
In general, you should argue to understand, not to win. This thread is not territory to be claimed by one group or another; indeed, the aim is to have many different viewpoints represented here. Thus, we also ask that you follow some guidelines:
-
Speak plainly. Avoid sarcasm and mockery. When disagreeing with someone, state your objections explicitly.
-
Be as precise and charitable as you can. Don't paraphrase unflatteringly.
-
Don't imply that someone said something they did not say, even if you think it follows from what they said.
-
Write like everyone is reading and you want them to be included in the discussion.
On an ad hoc basis, the mods will try to compile a list of the best posts/comments from the previous week, posted in Quality Contribution threads and archived at /r/TheThread. You may nominate a comment for this list by clicking on 'report' at the bottom of the post and typing 'Actually a quality contribution' as the report reason.
Jump in the discussion.
No email address required.
Notes -
There are many errors here. (1) Making more money and having more resources is universally considered dominance, and it is a dominance most associated with objective measures of national health, so I don’t actually know why you want to focus on “cultural dominance”. (1a) To make a very mottey example, Jews were dominant in the early years of Hollywood and historians would say as much, yet all of their major products fell in line with plainly goyish and Christian / post-Christian sensibilities… this was still to their benefit, as they made lots of money this way and were able to influence things slightly over time. (2) You haven’t argued why cultural dominance is a fruitful lense to look at entertainment products. (2a) We have many examples in history of clearly dominant groups wholecloth appropriating the aesthetic sensibilities of other nations: the Romans to Greeks, the Muslims to the Byzantines (the star-and-crescent was a Byzantine symbol), Germanics to the Romans. (2b) Entertainment products appropriate the surface-level artifacts of culture but not necessarily anything deeper, with Disney the best example: it appropriates Western art, but that’s it, and visual culture is often appropriated from a different group. (3) Appropriating the aesthetic sense of a different culture does not change the substantive kernel of culture, things like an individual’s relationship to work, family, community, values. A deeper analysis of these games would show a thoroughly Asian obsession with skill mastery, objective grading and peer competition and meritocracy, values which are actually absent the European Middle Ages whose focus was emotional [piety, love]. (4) If Western culture were dominant, we should see it in its fruits: its ability to make compelling leisure experiences. Why didn’t a Western company make Wukong or the other products? The power which enables one group to make more money than another group is indeed a cultural power in its rawest sense, especially when that money is made meritocratically, eg a video game that people buy after looking at gameplay. (5) What does the modern West have to do with the Catholic Middle Ages? Even Catholics are very far away from that culture.
More options
Context Copy link